Most humans pass from this world without leaving much of a trace. We're born, we live, we die, and for good or ill, we're eventually forgotten.But then there are others who do things that make us stand up and take notice even decades later. Tommie Smith and John Carlos are two such men.
It was 40 years ago at the 1968 Summer Olympics in Mexico City that Smith and Carlos strode to the podium to accept the gold and bronze medals they had won in the 200-meter sprint. But rather than just quietly accept their medals, the pair had something else in mind. Here's how David Davis, writing in Smithsonian, sets the scene:
Smith and Carlos, winners of the gold and bronze medals, respectively, in the event, had come to the ceremony dressed to protest: wearing black socks and no shoes to symbolize African-American poverty, a black glove to express African-American strength and unity. (Smith also wore a scarf, and Carlos beads, in memory of lynching victims.)
As the national anthem played and an international TV audience watched, each man bowed his head and raised a fist.
Smith and Carlos would pay a price for their protest. Back home, in a nation roiled by the Vietnam War and the assassinations of Rev. Martin Luther King and Senator Robert Kennedy, their protest landed like a lit match on a sea of gasoline. Avery Brundage, the American who was head of the International Olympic Committee, had the pair expelled from the Games, suspended from the U.S. Olympic team and sent home in disgrace.

Considering that Brundage was the same man who once praised the 1936 Summer Olympics in Berlin as the greatest ever, and who in his capacity as head of the US Olympic Committee, may very well have ejected two runners from the U.S. 4x100 relay team that year because they were Jewish, one has to wonder if his actions didn't serve as a badge of honor for Smith and Carlos.
The last 40 years haven't been easy for the pair, as they've paid a significant price for their protest. While many other American Olympians are rightly celebrated and honored, Smith and Carlos returned home to rage and anger instead of commercial endorsements. From my own perspective, whenever I hear ESPN's Michael Wilbon speak dismissively of the Miracle on Ice in Lake Placid in 1980, I always experience a flashback to the image of Smith and Carlos with their fists raised defiantly in the air. I have little doubt that the two events are connected in Wilbon's mind, and perhaps many others.
What plaudits they have won have been long-delayed. Only a few weeks ago, ESPN awarded them the network's Arthur Ashe Courage Award at its annual ESPYs ceremony. The honor led columnist Jonah Goldberg to blast the network, an effort that was responded to in kind by The Nation's Dave Zirin.
Wherever one might stand politically, there's little doubt that night in Mexico City continues to be relevant today. It's impossible not to view China's brazen efforts to crack down on dissent, both foreign and domestic, prior to the Beijing Games as a direct tribute to the power that Carlos and Smith demonstrated so dramatically on the medal stand.
So you can continue to call Carlos and Smith's protest self-indulgent if you must. From where I sit, they were doing no more than indulging in a fundamental human right that the organizers of the Beijing Games are doing their level best to eradicate not only from the Games but suffocate in their own society as well -- just ask American Olympic champion Joey Cheek.






























Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
8-06-2008 @ 4:04PM
Adam Jacobi said...
Great work, Eric.
Reply
8-06-2008 @ 5:11PM
Johnny said...
Well played, sir!
Reply
8-06-2008 @ 5:15PM
Stephanie Stradley said...
I hadn't thought of the compare and contrast of this moment in history and the Chinese games, and you did a great job talking about this. Moral highgrounds are difficult to pitch.
Reply
8-06-2008 @ 11:27PM
Moonshine Mike said...
Goldberg's complaints are centered on picking on Stuart Scott (rightfully) and linking the Salute with violence (yes, but it didn't always mean that).
I am wondering if we will see some silent protests as such. That would be fantastic.
Reply
8-06-2008 @ 11:36PM
jay said...
I am very thankful that these 2 courageous men had the idea of expressing to the world the oppression that not only African Americans felt, but for all people that were not given their god given right to be treated with respect and to be able to enjoy all of the benefits of being an American. Thank you for being at the right place at the right time.
Reply
8-07-2008 @ 9:09AM
Mark B said...
The question is not "Did these two men have a legitimate point?" The question is "Did these two men use good judgment in choosing when and where to voice that point?" Sadly, the answer is "No". The National Anthem is a symbol of unity- One Nation- Indivisible, With Liberty and Freedom, For All. Their spectacle showed not only showed complete disrespect for their nation but at that time helped widen the divide between races and cultures. The punishment was just and fitting, not because of their message, but in their choice of when and where to voice it. While the author points a finger at this episode, many forget George Foreman waving an American flag during the very same Olympics. They also forget the fact Foreman was vilified as a traitor to his people for that act because of it. When asked, Foreman said, "I couldn't see doing anything but waving that flag." Foreman knew well the difficulty blacks were facing in his country, but he also understood he was an ambassador. Smith and Carlos did not. In my mind Foreman got it right.
Reply
8-07-2008 @ 6:24PM
MD said...
It is much easier for those who were not being discriminated against, not treated as less then equal to criticize. In America I could not legally drink from a public water fountain or go to a restroom unless I found one marked "colored" . I could not eat at a restaurant or stay at a hotel. The state of Alabama paid my brothers' tuition at an out of state college rather than let them attend the University of Alabama or Auburn, even though they were well qualified. There is so much many do not understand. The raised fist was a peaceful symbol of pride and unity in the Black community. "I'm Black and I'm proud" was a theme that helped peolple realize that "Black" did not in any way mean inferior, despite how we were stigmatized. I love my country but it does not change the fact that the way it treated its Black citizens in the past was wrong.
8-07-2008 @ 10:05AM
Ken said...
I think Blacks were doing better back in the 60's, they had less children born out of wedlock from teenage mothers, and fewer men in jail. The whole afermative action program has not worked very well according to Obama, and Cosby. There is no winning talking about race, the only thing that is real and certian is money. For the Olympics the athletes need to support each other as a team and for their country, anything else they can do when they get back home.
Reply
8-07-2008 @ 3:50PM
jackfitz said...
carlos & smith were wrong! the olympics is no place to air our dirty laundry. it is supposed to be free of all politics, foreign & domestic. they took their own personal crusades on an international stage and disrespected our nation. put it this way, look at the image george foreman displayed as compared to smith & carlos. who is more respected and successful today?
Reply
8-07-2008 @ 5:40PM
Adam said...
The olympics are the best stage to speak out against injustice in the world. Kobe and Lebron should take a note from these guys and stop being sissy's for the money !
Reply
8-07-2008 @ 6:22PM
Moose said...
Yada yada yada. The Olympics have been a pile of road apples for 50 years, and they're a totally inconsequential joke these days. This institution was initiated for the sake of glorifying amateur sport, and this it did for six decades. But then, the games became nothing more than a Cold War PR exercise for a quarter century until the professionals took over. It's all a meaningless spectacle now, in place merely to generate revenues, take up media time and distract the droolers from the important issues facing human life at present. Besides which, they're boring. Ho-hum. If you're looking for entertainment value, flip to The Shopping Network or some infomercial channel instead.
Reply
8-08-2008 @ 12:43PM
joe said...
from my WHITE side, which i am the bothers were right & rightous !!! for those who say that there is a time & a place for making a point, where have you been ??? on MARS !!! when & how should they have done what they did ??? oh !! during a BLACK march... if so, would have IT really been noticed... maybe, but by most - not & of those who would have noticed - the cry would have been -- oh those up-puttie blacks are trying to RIOT etc etc.... bull crap ... to do things out of contrast - IS WHEN -- things get noticed & change can come from it..... joe
Reply
8-08-2008 @ 2:39PM
Graham said...
If you ask me, Smith and Carlos chose the perfect time for their protest. Just because the words "land of the free" appear in our National Anthem, don't make them always true.
It's also interesting to note that in The Star Spangled Banner the phrase "land of the free" is juxtaposed with "home of the brave." In my mind those two men did a very brave thing, and were willing to live with the consequences.
Reply
8-11-2008 @ 10:32AM
Sammy said...
They protested things that had happened years before in the country of their birth. What other country could they have been born in, that they would have had the chance to be the athletes they were? If their ancestors had not been in this country, they would not have met and given birth to these men. They should have thought about that before they made such an asinine "statement."
Reply
8-12-2008 @ 12:57AM
Luke said...
If we turn Olympics into a political forum, then we should also welcome:
- African Americans protesting against social injustice
- Half of the athletes protesting against Iraq war
- Third world countries protesting against us for wasting most of the world resource
- We protest the Chinese for Tibetan independence
- Irish protest the English for Ireland independence
- Chinese protest the capitalism/imperialism for exploitation and environment
and the list goes on and on.
Are we really ready for that?
Reply