
FINA, the governing body for swimming, apparently has video that helps reassure without a doubt that Michael Phelps edged Milorad Cavic at the wall in the 100 meter butterfly. But you won't get to see it.
In one of those moves that I'm sure makes sense to FINA and no one else, the fact that the video shows Phelps touches before Cavic is enough. There's no reason to reveal the video to anyone else. Why let everyone see, when you can go on FINA's word. The New York Times explained the exchange:
Christopher Clarey of The International Herald Tribune tracked down Cornel Marculescu, FINA's executive director, at the Water Cube to ask him about the decision to not release the images. Marculescu said it was a matter of policy, and that the Serbian team was satisfied with the ruling after seeing the images - so there is no need to share the images.Christopher pressed, asking why FINA wouldn't distribute the footage if it showed the margin conclusively. Marculescu said: "We are not going to distribute footage. We are not doing these kinds of things. Everything is good. What are you going to do with the footage? See what the Serbians already saw? It is clarified for us beyond any doubt.
Marculescu forgets one big thing--there's no reason not to release the images. Why not let everyone see what you saw? Is there any harm in it?
And beyond that, Cavic himself seems quite happy to have the silver.
"If it was up to me, I would just drop the protest," he said before FINA made its ruling. "I'm stoked with what happened. I'm very, very happy. I don't want to fight this. It is a gold medal at stake. It's a difficult thing to lose, but you have to understand I came into this competition with the goal to win a bronze medal. I went my best time and did better than bronze. I got silver and almost got gold."But by failing to release the video of the final dash into the wall, FINA is doing no one any favors.






























Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
8-16-2008 @ 12:05PM
Martin said...
Swimmers go to great lengths to achieve even the slightest of advantages, and after this race, they will probably all let their fingernails grow to give them a little longer reach.
Reply
8-17-2008 @ 12:07PM
John said...
There are a lot of people who don't believe Phelps won by 1/100 of a sec. FINA should show the proof. Phelps deservs it. It's a disgrace to "protect" this info...protect from what?
8-16-2008 @ 12:35PM
RAY KIRBY said...
THE STATEMENT THAT THEY DONT SHOW PHELPS TOUCHING FIRST IS UNTRUE, IT WAS DISPLAYED RIGHT AFTER THE RACE
Reply
8-16-2008 @ 2:32PM
CHUCK said...
How about Jenna Wolfe. I hadn't seen her before, she's so funny I can't believe it.
Reply
8-16-2008 @ 2:34PM
RAY KIRBY said...
ON RPC CABLE IN PANAMA IT WAS AS CLEAR AS A BELL THAT PHELPS TOUCHED FIRST. IT WAS REPLAYED AT LEAST THREE TIMES AFTER THE RACE.THERE SEEMS TO BE TOO MUCH BAD JUDGING TOO MUCH BIAS AND TOO MANY WHINNING BLOGGERS
Reply
8-16-2008 @ 3:06PM
mb said...
SI.com - shows frame by frame
Reply
8-16-2008 @ 8:26PM
SAL said...
HEY ! DO YOU KNOW PHELP 'S FINGERNAIL ITS ABOUT 4 INCHES LONG THAT WHY HE WON !
Reply
8-16-2008 @ 8:58PM
BWS said...
JJ you are an idiot who is just trying to stir controversy to make a name for yourself. So just shut up and let it go moron.
Reply
8-17-2008 @ 11:12AM
flipper said...
I TIVO'd frame by frame on various angles and Phelps does actually touch 1st by the preverbial c hair!
Reply
8-17-2008 @ 6:09PM
CHRIS said...
PHELPS CLEARLY LOST
Reply
8-18-2008 @ 5:43PM
Michael Barillas said...
I Think FINA Should Show The Video Coverage To Fans, And Prove A Point Of Michael Phelps Almost Covering The "Omega, God" Ad; Dedicating The Winning Moment To "Zues, God" Who Provided Rights For The "Olympics".
Reply